Holding Politicians Accountable

5 notes

The Supreme Court did the right thing today (finally): 

"The Supreme Court declined on Monday to review a challenge to the ban on direct campaign contributions by corporations.
"The petitioners, William Danielczyk Jr. and Eugene Biagi, argued the ban on political donations from corporations to candidates and party committees was unconstitutional. They said a review of the ban was warranted after the high court’s Citizens United decision in 2010, which let corporations spend unlimited funds advocating for or against candidates.
"The current Supreme Court has already taken steps to ease restrictions on campaign giving, and many good-government groups feared the long-standing ban on corporate donations would be the next barrier to fall."

The Hill

The Supreme Court did the right thing today (finally): 

"The Supreme Court declined on Monday to review a challenge to the ban on direct campaign contributions by corporations.

"The petitioners, William Danielczyk Jr. and Eugene Biagi, argued the ban on political donations from corporations to candidates and party committees was unconstitutional. They said a review of the ban was warranted after the high court’s Citizens United decision in 2010, which let corporations spend unlimited funds advocating for or against candidates.

"The current Supreme Court has already taken steps to ease restrictions on campaign giving, and many good-government groups feared the long-standing ban on corporate donations would be the next barrier to fall."

The Hill

Filed under Supreme Court campaign donations campaign finance

  1. maneatingbadger reblogged this from campaignmoney
  2. urthbruce reblogged this from campaignmoney
  3. campaignmoney posted this